Condensed from Business Insurance, November 2, 2009 Edition Author: Roberto Ceniceros
Construction contract disputes loom as demand grows for buildings that meet environmental efficiency
standards, insurance and legal experts say.
When an existing building is damaged, currently available property/casualty insurance products may pay
insureds for the additional cost of rebuilding to a "green standard". Further, insurance policies can
be obtained to protect property owners from losses during the course of construction of a "green"
building.
However, P&C underwriters have refrained, according to the article, from insuring a potential liability
that contractors and design professionals may face. This potential liability exists for disputes between
building owners and contractors or architects and engineers in the event a new building doesn't meet
certification standards like those established by the U.S. Green Building Council, a not-for-profit
organization known for its Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification. Under
LEED’s rating system, four levels of certification are possible depending on the building’s green
qualities, with the highest level of LEED certification being platinum.
Demand for green buildings is growing for several reasons including -
The incentives could fuel disputes between building owners and construction professionals, according to
several cited sources. These disputes could arise when contractors or design professionals promise to
construct a building that will obtain a specific green certification rating, but fails to meet the
certification requirements for that rating.
The incentives that could potentially be lost include tax credits that building owners expected to reap
from certification, said Paul Primavera, SVP for Lockton Construction Services Group. He said, "Lost
tax incentives are a "new wrinkle" that green construction as added to traditional construction-related
liabilities".
Additionally, investigating what might have gone wrong during construction or rebuilding certain parts of
a project to meet certification requirements could be costly and could send building owners to seek
redress experts have noted. "There is certainly going to be litigation coming out soon around this
issue and insurance companies are waiting to see the loss results before developing coverage products,"
said David Cohen, senior product director for commercial insurance at Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company in
Novato, CA.
"A contractor’s failure to deliver a certain certification could fall under a surety bond remedy,"
Paul Becker, Nashville, TN-based construction practice leased of Willis NA and president of the
construction division of Willis Americas, noted.
So far, only one lawsuit involving a failure to deliver a specified green certification has gained any
attention. The case involved a Maryland condominium project with tax credits at stake totaling hundreds of
thousands of dollars. The claim was settled without resulting in any legal precedent, so details are
sketchy at best.
"More lawsuits could arise because many buildings that have been under construction during the past two
years are beginning to seek green certification status," said Thomas Taylor, general manager for
Vertegy, and Alberici Enterprise and sustainability consultant in St. Louis.
2009 IMUA annual meeting in Tucson in May 2009] It is only a matter of time; more will develop on this topic.
|